<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for QuadBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quadcem.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quadcem.com/blog</link>
	<description>From the mind of QuadCEM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:11:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Compression Software: PeaZip, NanoZip, 7-Zip, WinRAR, WinZip, Tar by Huffman</title>
		<link>http://www.quadcem.com/blog/2009/04/02/compression-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2018</link>
		<dc:creator>Huffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quadcem.com/blog/?p=71#comment-2018</guid>
		<description>While achieving better compression than ZIP, WinRAR is by far NOT the most powerful compression.
You will find that NanoZip will beat RAR file size by huge margins (sometimes even 20%).
But I agree that it is very experimental and maybe not suitable for everyday office use. Yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While achieving better compression than ZIP, WinRAR is by far NOT the most powerful compression.<br />
You will find that NanoZip will beat RAR file size by huge margins (sometimes even 20%).<br />
But I agree that it is very experimental and maybe not suitable for everyday office use. Yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compression Software: PeaZip, NanoZip, 7-Zip, WinRAR, WinZip, Tar by QuadCEM</title>
		<link>http://www.quadcem.com/blog/2009/04/02/compression-software/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadCEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quadcem.com/blog/?p=71#comment-604</guid>
		<description>Nice catch, it looks like WinRAR and Squeez can write in RAR format.  Both are still shareware, though.  I wonder if Squeez licensed RAR out or if they&#039;re affiliated in some way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice catch, it looks like WinRAR and Squeez can write in RAR format.  Both are still shareware, though.  I wonder if Squeez licensed RAR out or if they&#8217;re affiliated in some way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compression Software: PeaZip, NanoZip, 7-Zip, WinRAR, WinZip, Tar by Ivica</title>
		<link>http://www.quadcem.com/blog/2009/04/02/compression-software/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quadcem.com/blog/?p=71#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Squeez have full rar support. 

http://www.speedproject.de/enu/squeez/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Squeez have full rar support. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.speedproject.de/enu/squeez/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.speedproject.de/enu/squeez/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compression Software: PeaZip, NanoZip, 7-Zip, WinRAR, WinZip, Tar by QuadCEM</title>
		<link>http://www.quadcem.com/blog/2009/04/02/compression-software/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>QuadCEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quadcem.com/blog/?p=71#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Yeah I can&#039;t deny that ... 7zip has always been my favorite.  I&#039;m at least starting to use peazip to see how much I can get used to it.  The *nix version of peazip looks like it&#039;s better than the windows one I tested here (the GUI aspects of it, at least).  I&#039;d give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I can&#8217;t deny that &#8230; 7zip has always been my favorite.  I&#8217;m at least starting to use peazip to see how much I can get used to it.  The *nix version of peazip looks like it&#8217;s better than the windows one I tested here (the GUI aspects of it, at least).  I&#8217;d give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compression Software: PeaZip, NanoZip, 7-Zip, WinRAR, WinZip, Tar by rohin</title>
		<link>http://www.quadcem.com/blog/2009/04/02/compression-software/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>rohin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quadcem.com/blog/?p=71#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Love the article , thanks a million man !

I personally prefer 7zip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the article , thanks a million man !</p>
<p>I personally prefer 7zip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
